
RIP Mike Awesome, you will be missed,
Wrestling columns and reviews from WWE to TNA and ROH.

Legend and icon are words that get used far too often these days to refer to someone who is of merely above average importance. However when referring to Samoa Joe and his importance to Ring of Honor, then these terms seem to hardly do justice to a man who has been the heart of soul of the company for the past 3 years. It's fair to say that without Joe there might not have been a Ring of Honor in 2007. His near 2 year title reign in 2003/4 gave the company stability at a time when it was going through the kind of internal upheavals that have seen other company's fold. His 60 minute matches with CM Punk gave the company an identity and helped elevate it from being 'just another indie', while his 5 star match against Kenta Kobashi in 2004 helped establish ROH on the world stage and secured his position as one of the best wrestlers in the world today.

And so ends the five weeks of five consecutive wrestling pay per views. They've varied from good (TNA Genesis and Turning Point) to OK (Survivor Series) to the downright awful (December to Dismember) so it can hardly be a surprise that expectations were low for Armageddon. Holding a show so close to Chrsitmas was always going to be a problem, however adding to that the lacklustre state of WWE creative that won't allow a brand to plan any further ahead than the next pay-per-view (even if that show is for another brand) and you can't help but be sceptical. The line-up ahead of the show was also far from fantastic and showed just how the Smackdown brand is aching for star power that they had to draft in John Cena to help boost the buyrate. However in the end, it was an unanounced surprise match that most people will remember this show for and one that, if they had anounced it ahead of the show would more likely have generated some actual interest in the show, but I guess that isn't WWE's way in 2006.
Forget the debuts of Raven, Rhino or Christian. Forget the great matches such as AMW vs. XXX or Styles vs. Daniels vs. Joe. Forget the return of legends such as Sting, Randy Savage or Lex Luger. Forget the arrival of the 6 sided ring, forget the move to Spike, forget the first monthly pay per view. This Thursday was, bar none, the most signifcant moment in TNA history.
In one 3 minute segement, TNA finally arrived on a major stage. Bu havingKurt Angle appearin on Impact, a genuine superstar of wrestling finally appeared on TNA TV. And by having him confront TNA's most important homegrown talent, in Samoa Joe, it signalled to the world that TNA could actually be a genuine alternative to WWE. In my view, this is as important a moment to TNA as McMahon screwing Bret was for WWF or Hogan turning heel was for WCW. Prior to this moment, Bound For Glory was an above average card, not a must-see event. However with the promise of a 'confrontation' between Angle and Joe it instantly becomes a must-see and must-buy event for both hardcore and casual fans alike. This kind of interest is something TNA could not achieve with months of build for Sting vs. Jarrett and has the potential to be the moment that establishes the future of TNA in the eyes of the wrestling world.

It's WWE No Mercy pay per view weekend and you have to ask yourself, really who cares? The line-up is less than thrilling, so much so that WWE have seen fit to change the main event less than a week before the show. Not a single match on the show feels like a genuine main event, even with the rearranged line-up. The rematch of Booker T vs. Batista from Summerslam was the original choice for the main event, but after their lacklustre match at Summerlsam this was changed to Booker vs. Lashley. These two had some decent matches when Lashley was US Champion, but he is nowehere near ready for a main event role without there being something of a back up. At a dual-brand (or should it be tri-band these days) show that would be fine, but not when this match is supposed to be selling the show. The same is true of Batista vs. Finlay which was the other match of note to be merged into the now fourway main event. Now Finlay has been a revelation since her returned, but he is not a main eventer. His in-ring skills will certainly help caryy Batista to a decent match, but would you pay to see this? I thought not.
Because of loaded main events, someone at WWE actually made the senisble decision to not overload the undercard and as such we actually had 3 really good wrestling matches, all of which were given enough time to tell an interesting story and actually be cometitive. The first of these was the Intercontiental Championship match between Johnny Nitro and Jeff Hardy and was a perfect example of how the IC title should be used in WWE. These two young athletes [attempted] to have a high-paced, competitive wrestling match and darn near pulled it off. By having these young guys go out and have good matches, with as little silliness as possible, WWE actually managed to make the IC title seem important and gave these 2 the oppurtunity to showcase just what they could do. Unfortunately neither man is the next Chris Benoit or Eddie Guerrero and at times the match was very disjointed, but it was perfectly fine for what it was. If WWE were to continue to put on matches like this, then they could well draw back in many of the fans they have alienated over the past year as bad angles can be forgiven if they are acccompanied by some decent wrestling because that is what the majority of fans really want. In many ways, this match could have done with being swapped with the Randy Orton vs. Carlito match which came before the main event, as this was another strong wrestling match between two young athletes who are still establishing themselves in WWE. The main difference though, was that Carlito and Orton put on a much more exciting match, which would have been a stronger opener, however it makes sense to split the title matches up. Let's hope at the enxt show we see someone like Super Crazy, Shelton Benjamin or Charlie Haas given the chance to show what they can do in this position, because if they do, then the future of the Intercontinental division is in good hands.
The third match of consequence on the show was the Women's Title match between Trishc Stratus and Lita. With the history that these two women have together, it was always going to be a good encounter, the only thing that was going to hold it back would be the booking and how much time it was given. Fortunately Trishs' 'retirement' match was given the repestc that WWE seldom gives it's performers and thanks to a decent amount of time and nice a history package, this was one of the highlights of the night, not an excuse for a snack break. Trish winning in her home town with a sharpshooter was a nice touch, however the lack of any post-match celebration really took away from what could have been a real 'highlight reel' moment. But then again, this is the women's division in WWE, should we really be surprised!



I suppose I should expect nothing less from a company who shamelssly exploit the death of one of their own wrestlers. However I felt the mention of Steve Irwin in the Matt Striker's Classroom segment on ECW TV this week went beyond the bounds of what any reasonable person could regard as good taste. We all know WWE is the lowest common denominator when it comes to television, howevber it is crass and tasteless remarks that help put it there and will prevent it from ever raising itself above gutter level., What relevance Steve Irwin had to a WWE broadcast is beyond me and the fact that it was made with a few days of his untimely death is beyond anything which any right minded person should expect to see mad fun of on their TV. Now Vince and co I am sure wil tell you that what they were doing was being topical and trying to garner heat for Striker. However what it really proved is that WWE is trash TV and it has tarnished what has been otherwise very strong run of telvision from the ECW brand.